Don’t let any “deniers” tell you differently-climate models do contain solar forcing. But the solar effect is known to be erroneous! Anyone who claims otherwise hasn’t read the IPCC reports. What am I talking about? Well this presentation has the answer. The IPCC has not denied the findings of multiple studies that the signal of the eleven year solar cycle in temperature data is .1 degrees Celsius (For example, Douglass and Calder). But this is not the magnitude of the effect found in models! The magnitude, in models, is just .o3 degrees Celsius-you heard that right, they underestimate the solar cycle effect by over 3 times! It obviously follows that the amount of warming due to solar effects is wrong, and too low. From which it follows that the anthropogenic contribution is too high. Nobody can disagree with this without going against the IPCC (the “consensus”). Granted, with enough aerosol forcing, this can be fit within the paradigm of a strong CO2 effect, but the more likely explanation is that amplifying mechanisms act to make solar activity more important in a climate that is relatively insensitive to greenhouse forcing.